 | | cputw
|
| Maybe we'd better opt for unsigned char c=word&0xff; cputc_... cputc_... c=word>>8; cputc_... cputc_... instead - your patch doesn't work with my compiler version! This may generate better assembly code, too, as word is already in a register. (25 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: cputw
|
| (...) By "doesn't work", I assume the patch applied successfully and your compiler barfed with some sort of error message or generated incorrect code. That would tend to (at least slightly) indicate that the problem that I was trying to fix may have (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
