Subject:
|
Re: some measurements in lnp, please comment!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 03:29:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3216 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Kenneth Johansen wrote:
>
> so i guess that im asking, anyone know the bandwidth and practical
> throughput that the lnp protocol supports?
>
> regards
> kenneth johansen
> kennethj@stud.cs.uit.no
Old thread, but oh, well.
4800 baud is 4800 bits per second or 600 bytes per second. If you assume 50%
overhead, which is optimistic, that's 300 bytes per second. So I think anything
over 200 bytes per second is pretty good.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some measurements in lnp, please comment!
|
| "Brian B. Alano" <alano@bloomington.in.us> wrote in message news:HL30D6.1rDC@lugnet.com... (...) practical (...) assume 50% (...) think anything (...) I'm not familiar with LNP, but I do have a good handle on infra-red messaging in general. There (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | some measurements in lnp, please comment!
|
| hi all, i have made some measurements with lnp in legOS 0.2.4 under ideal conditions (dark room with minimal load on PC and RCX) and found that sending a 10 byte message with lnp_addressing_write averages on about 0.06136 seconds (+/- 10 ms for time (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
