Subject:
|
Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:45:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3041 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
From the second scope screen capture here :
http://www.philohome.com/sensors/legorot.htm, you can see that the analog
settling time is about 10 microseconds for the rotation sensor.
Philo
www.philohome.com
> I did find an improvement in having a delay after cutting off power.
> But, like the standard firmware, I filled the delay with doing
> useful things. I haven't settled ;-) on a suitable time though.
> I imagine that will involve getting in there with the scope and a few
> sensors to nail it down. I'll post any results when I get to this.
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results
|
| (...) I've found that any interrupt on the RCX has a minimum overhead of 101 to 113 states (or about 7 us). This is the time taken by the CPU to recognize and dispatch the interrupt plus the time the ROM routine takes to dispatch the interrupt to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (14-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (14-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Joseph Woolley (14-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Michael Obenland (14-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Joseph Woolley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Joseph Woolley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Gunther Lemm (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Joseph Woolley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Gunther Lemm (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Joseph Woolley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![RE: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Ralph Hempel (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Dick Swan (14-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Kekoa Proudfoot (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results -Mark Riley (15-Jan-03 to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|