Subject:
|
Re: brickOS and latest binutils
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:34:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3410 times
|
| |
|
|
Nick Tarleton <nickptar@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> > The "invalid symbolsrec file" issue (error from makelx) issue is now
> > fixed in binutils CVS, both on the trunk, and on the 2.13 branch -
> > so the next release of binutils, be it 2.13.2 or 2.14 will have this
> > fixed.
> What's the change? Has the symbolsrec format reverted to the one used
> before?
The $-sign before symbol addresses was accidentaly removed when that bit of
code was re-written to fix a different bug. It's now back.
> > The "ld segmentation fault" issue is rather more tricky, and will
> > require the attention of a binutils COFF guru, but this patch to
> > Makefile.user works around it:
> Why a COFF guru? To understand the h8300-coff format?
Not really. I may have overstated that. Basically, it involves some
moderately complex interactions between different source files - at least,
to complex for me to know where a fix should best be applied (I had never
looked at binutils source a week ago.)
> Sorry if these are stupid questions. Just curious.
Not at all. Curiosity was what drove me to investigate this.
Note: Even previous versions of binutils which don't segfault, do silently
corrupt a bit of their memory, and then flukily just happen to work anyway.
Max.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: brickOS and latest binutils
|
| (...) What's the change? Has the symbolsrec format reverted to the one used before? (...) Why a COFF guru? To understand the h8300-coff format? Sorry if these are stupid questions. Just curious. (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
