 | | Re: Polling sensor values with wait_event —Joseph Woolley
| | | | Thomas, You are mostly correct. However, keep in mind that tasks with the same priority get checked in turn. The first task in the priority chain does not get undo precedence over the others in the same priority level. Example: Tasks A, B and C all (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Polling sensor values with wait_event —Thomas Gysi
| | | | | Hi Joe, Thanks for your reply, I guess that is the solution to use in this case. I'll still just get values every 20ms. By changing the timeslice I could have this go a bit faster though. Thomas (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Polling sensor values with wait_event —Joseph Woolley
| | | | | Thomas, I had a thought about this situation. You could write a function that sets a flag when the event is triggered, do nothing otherwise. You could call this function from within each of the tasks you write (at a somewhat high frequency ... say (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | | |
