To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / *3964 (-5)
  Re: earlier version of binutils?
 
(...) Hi again, I've got it working now, thanks to help from Jochen Hoenicke and Peter Gammie. I've posted my notes on the process here, if anyone is interested: (URL) now I've got a new problem... Everything was working great for about a day, but (...) (18 years ago, 31-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: train precision
 
(...) Yes, I used the same code for controlling Legway as the Great Ball Contraption train. That's what I posted here: (URL) (18 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: train precision
 
(...) didn't find the c code in the url you mentioned. You used the same technique in the train, as in the legway? daniel (18 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: train precision
 
(...) thanks for the suggestion, Brian I want to make some experimences with LDCC some day. But not in this project. daniel (18 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: train precision
 
(...) ... (...) ... (...) ... (...) As Brian said, it's not the motors, it's the RCX. You can run Technic motors off a train controller, and you can vary the speed. But you need to do a bit more if you're using the RCX. We used that scheme when we (...) (18 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR