|
|
 | | Re: LNP-problem...
|
| That looks ok to me. But I'm no expert on LNP. Here's a clip I use. It looks a lot like what you're using. It seems there may be a problem with your receive code. I'm REAL shaky on that. What does fputs do? ---- char *s; s = "101"; if (strlen(s)>0) (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: LNP-problem...
|
| (...) ok this is the (relevant) code running on the rcx: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char *p; init(); execi(&PacketWatcher, 0, NULL, PRIO_NORMAL, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); execi(&Messenger, 0, NULL, PRIO_LOWEST, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); return 0; } (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Motor Control Register (0xf000)
|
| (...) It's the one I meant, thanks. Jürgen (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Why...
|
| Nick, Setting the timeslice to a low number (5ms is fairly low), negetively effects overall system performance. Time used by the operating system for task switching is taken away from applications. If a switch takes .5ms (for example) and you switch (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Why...
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ... is the minimum timeslice interval 5ms? I'm writing a program that needs a routine to be run every 1ms for a period of time. I did this by setting it as the timeslice handler, but then I needed to (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
