 | | Re: IS free()'s operation atomic?
|
|
(...) I agree, free() is not ISR safe. One thread can get preempted after the check but before the store, and a second thread can adjust mm_first_free, making the first thread's check invalid. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | IS free()'s operation atomic?
|
|
Hi all I think that free() operation in mm.c is not ISR safe in multitasking mode. This operation is not keep coherence about value of mm_first_free,is it? ---...--- in mm.c ---...--- // for task safe operations, free needs to be // atomic and (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Rom sensor read routine
|
|
In writing some sensor code yesterday/today (it's 6 am), I passed over the ROM sensor code at 14c0. The documentation has been put in the usual place. The rotation code is pretty simple: the expected state machine, with split points between the four (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
(...) given (...) lego (...) [ stuff about lego/native collisions ] (...) of a (...) on (...) I was wondering, since people are considering using tags in the LNP frame to signify local to local messages, could we not also use this to "label" non (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: loading s/w
|
|
(...) In my brief experimentation with rom_reset(), it does not actually clear the rom- rather it only starts the program over again (in main()). Is this intentional? I get this behavior when calling it from main- when calling it from within another (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
