Subject:
|
Re: Light sensor initialization?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:42:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org^StopSpam^
|
Viewed:
|
1888 times
|
| |
|
|
Jonathan Knudsen <jonathan@oreilly.com> wrote:
> Matthew's program takes one reading at initialization time to
> determine a baseline value. Any reading that falls 7 units
> below this is assumed to be a dark line.
> I take a somewhat more conservative approach, taking 10
Wow. I feel I should point out that experimentally my method works 100% of
the time. :)
On the other hand, mine is a special-case application: the light sensor is
used to read color values from a surface, which presumably will have very
little variation. If you're looking to get ambient light level in a room,
for example, the more complicated code is probably justified.
> 1. You might want to run your robot at different times of day and have it
> work right. Hardcoded values will probably fail you here.
> 2. Different light sensors produce different readings for the same amount
> of light. Doing a runtime calibration increases the chances that your
> program can work on someone else's robot.
3. You sometimes run your robots on nice white paper, and sometimes you have
brown packing paper. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Light sensor initialization?
|
| Matthew's program takes one reading at initialization time to determine a baseline value. Any reading that falls 7 units below this is assumed to be a dark line. I take a somewhat more conservative approach, taking 10 readings over one second and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
