 | | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there? —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | (...) Todd, I know there was an RCX #1 (000001). I'm pretty sure both the 1.0 and 1.5 are marked as 1.0 At one time, someone started a list of RCX numbers. I couldn't find it on the web. I have a 2.0 numbered 767082 Steve (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there? —Jordan Bradford
|
| | | | (...) It's right here: (URL) I have three entries in the list. (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there? —Suzanne Rich
|
| | | | | (...) Hoh! That is so cool! I would love to see it graphed. Someone should promote the adding of data to this. I had completely forgotten about it. When I got my first RCX, I remember being required to "register" it at the official website. But I (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's the highest number RCX out there? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Looks like they are definitely not unique - I have a 1.0 number 016642 that is already listed by Mox in NZ. ROSCO (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| | | | |
