 | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Mark Riley
|
| | | (...) Hi Philippe, I've been adding support for the Spybot and Manas remotes to my custom firmware LDCC. The idea is to allow 3 people to each control a seperate train using these remotes. This is how I discovered the problem with RCX 1.0 not (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks, Mark, I was indeed using standard firmware through NQC... Philo (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) Mark, Thanks for posting this. I've been trying to figure out how to do that, but I don't know enough about the IR messages and baud control of BrickOS to do it myself. (...) I don't know if this is printed anywhere, but here's some more info (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) As cool as this sounds, it's not right. :( Sorry about that. There are just the two bits (like Mark said above). See, this is why I haven't been able to get my Spybot remote to work with my RCX. :) Steve (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Mark Riley
|
| | | | (...) You're welcome! (...) Well, I did try it out and it does work... somewhat. For example, when you set the channel to 5 using the technique mentioned above, only some of the remote packets reflect 5 as the channel number, while others still (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —John Hansen
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks a lot for posting this very useful information, Mark! I don't know how long I've been beating my head against the brick trying to make heads or tails out of the values I calculated for the various possible combinations of button (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Mark Riley
|
| | | | | | (...) [snippage] (...) [more snippage] (...) Glad you like the chart. Trying to find a way to present the information in a useful manner was the trick for me, too. :-) I'll have to throw up a web page or something. As to figuring it out, credit has (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) ... (...) ... (...) Yes. The extra channels are for non-repeating stuff. Like you said. (...) Well, I've discovered (while working on a Spybot project) that if you ask just the right question, the people at LEGO may reply to it. They are (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| | | | |
