 | | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty —Markus L. Noga
|
| | | (...) Cost. Plain and simple. (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty —Lee Jorgensen
|
| | | | (...) That and Lego must be investing in battery companies ... :) -Lee. (25 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty —Jorge Rodriguez
|
| | | | Did they take out the whole jack or just put on a new cover that hides it. (...) Jorge Rodríguez rodriguez.136@osu.edu (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty —Michael Gasperi
|
| | | | Jorge Rodriguez <rodriguez.136@osu.edu> wrote in message news:384b69a4.915347...net.com... (...) I was told by LEGO guys that it is totally gone and even the circuit board has been changed. You have to somehow feed power in as though it was coming (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | What I don't understand is why does it still say RCX 1.0 on the plastic? The mold is obviously different, why diddn't they change the version stamp? KL (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
