 | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Constantine Hannaher
|
| | | Don't punish yourself! At least you rendered the symbols from the gear correctly. There are at least four errors in the message I was responding to: (1) confusing the prefix n for nano with the unit symbol N for newton; (2) attaching two prefixes (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) Using a unit of energy for torque would be very strange. You get an energy if you turn s.th. against a torque through some angle (expressed in radians, I think). Angles have no unit (or just 1), hence the units of torque and energy are equal. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Constantine Hannaher
|
| | | | (...) from (...) for (...) and (...) Looking further, I note that the newton.meter is the preferred unit for the quantity "moment of force" (also known as torque). (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
