 | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Constantine Hannaher
|
| | | N.cm = newton.centimeter (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Dave Mee
|
| | | | | "Constantine Hannaher" <constantine.hannahe...shome.com> wrote in message news:GB7xrE.KJ3@lugnet.com... (...) Whoah! Thanks for the insights everybody! N.cm? This stuff is meant to be used by 12 year old kids? 27 year old kid hangs his head in (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Constantine Hannaher
|
| | | | | | Don't punish yourself! At least you rendered the symbols from the gear correctly. There are at least four errors in the message I was responding to: (1) confusing the prefix n for nano with the unit symbol N for newton; (2) attaching two prefixes (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | | | (...) Using a unit of energy for torque would be very strange. You get an energy if you turn s.th. against a torque through some angle (expressed in radians, I think). Angles have no unit (or just 1), hence the units of torque and energy are equal. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Constantine Hannaher
|
| | | | | | (...) from (...) for (...) and (...) Looking further, I note that the newton.meter is the preferred unit for the quantity "moment of force" (also known as torque). (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5 —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | I did'nt have the piece with me at the time I posted to lugnet, and yes Symbology is important. Increadibly, all of these mechanical aspects can be mapped out and calculated. It's just cool. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| | | | |
