|
|
 | | Re: NQC ideas
|
| (...) Who says NQC has to be C99 compliant? Thanks for the update though. I've not been following C updates. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC ideas
|
| (...) As of C99 that is no longer true, though still current usage to support older compilers. Jürgen (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: NQC ideas
|
| (...) I'd say go for it, it is still quite uncommon for C programmers to put their variable declarations elsewhere. Jürgen (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: legousb driver under kernel 2.4.20-athlon
|
| (...) You can try to add -athlon at the end of EXTRAVERSION so that it becomes -4GB-athlon in the kernel Makefile, and then recompile. Jürgen (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: NQC ideas
|
| (...) Hi John, C is more restrictive than C++ when it comes to variable declaration. In C, you can only declare variables at the beginning of a block before any executable. Well, lets see..... any variables declared outside a function are by (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
