 | | RE: legOS make newbe question
|
|
(...) Like I said, I'm willing to host such a site for at least a year if others would like to contribute. That offer includes any necessary binaries for other tools as well- pbFORTH, NQC, etc. -Luis ###...### Profanity is the one language that all (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS make newbe question
|
|
(...) platform. (...) Same here.. That Gavin package...that might have been the one I downloaded...but even that one had a crazy directory structure, and all the compiled EXE's had names about 16 letters long! How about something simple like GCC (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS make newbe question
|
|
I appreciate your help, and it does sound interseting. However, I'm sure I'm not alone when I say that I'd prefer to leverage my (much more marketable) C skills when writing programs for the RCX. That's why I'm using NQC right now - I already know (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: legOS make newbe question
|
|
(...) As a professional programmer, I just don't have the time, interest, or inclination to fiddle with building the GNU tools. I have tried to do this by following other folks best efforts and got something that was 95% functional. and in the end, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: legOS make newbe question
|
|
(...) Geez, I hate to plug my own work, but why not try the new pbFORTH. You can have arrays, as many variables as you want, simple multitasking, etc... No need for a compiler, just a terminal emulator will work. You DO have to try and learn FORTH, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
