|
|
 | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) SENSOR_READ has changed, I think the sense of the result is different 4000 POWER_GET returns (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 8:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Am I doing something wrong here (my FORTH is a bit rusty)? : .VOLTAGE RCX_POWER [ HEX ] 4001 (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 7:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Actually, I thought that anything running interactively (or I suppose more accurately not (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Well, I'm not in a position that I really need MARKER with the multitasking testing, just a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:13 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Definately 2 (...) I couldn't see it earlier, but I see now that the voltage in millivolts (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
|
