 | | Re: Enhanced standard NXT firmware
|
|
(...) That's great news, David. I'm glad that you are having success using the new CommExecuteFunction system call. I haven't had a chance to test it at all yet personally but I was very confident that it would just work seeing as how exposing it (...) (19 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
 | | Re: Enhanced standard NXT firmware
|
|
"John Hansen" <afanofosc@comcast.net> wrote in message news:JF0sGr.M2w@lugnet.com... (...) implement (...) big snip Great job John. And thank you especially for CommExecuteFunction. I couldn't believe that Lego didn't allow a way to make a Bluetooth (...) (19 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
 | | More firmware enhancements
|
|
I have implemented OP_WAIT and a variant of OP_WAIT which takes a variable rather than an immediate numeric value (which in nbc is called "waitv"). I also modified NBC to accept a command line switch that tells it whether the firmware supports waits (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
 | | Re: Faster NXT LCD Screen Refresh
|
|
(...) Okay, there's a little more to it than this. If you have a display that supports greyscales, it can control the level of the voltage jolt that's applied to each pixel during the actual refresh cycle. That way you get a smoother display with (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Faster NXT LCD Screen Refresh
|
|
(...) So that is how you did it. I was wondering about this ever since I saw the announcement. Incidentally, this would have been great cross posted to .color as well. <</robotics/nxt/?n=539>> Doug (19 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking, FTX)
|