To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.nxtOpen lugnet.robotics.nxt in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / NXT / 958
957  |  959
Subject: 
Re: The Future of Trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:41:46 GMT
Viewed: 
9411 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Brian Davis wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Philippe Hurbain wrote:

A practical value is about 1A - NXT motor driver itself
limits the current around 1A too.

Ah, thank you - so running two stalled train motors would exceed the NXT output,
but running one train motor up to a stall conditions should be fine. Out of
curiosity, along with the output limitations on the NXT (1 A) and RCX (500 mA),
does anyone have the output limitations (voltage and current) on the train
transformer?

The linear regulator inside is a 1.5A version if I remember well, but I may be
wrong. Cross posted to lugnet.trains trying to get train guru opinion...

Philo

At BayLTC we usually run four train motors on one loop using stock Controller
with a 1.2 amp wall wart.

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Future of Trains
 
(...) The linear regulator inside is a 1.5A version if I remember well, but I may be wrong. Cross posted to lugnet.trains trying to get train guru opinion... Philo (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)

124 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in NXT programmable brick

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
15 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR