Subject:
|
RE: RotateMotorEx hangs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.nxt
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:15:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
21189 times
|
| |
|
|
As long as it will still retain the value of rotation count, it will be very
useful. Otherwise, it will be bad! This will help in simulating an event
driven instance. Do you see there is any down side of this implementation
other than a few more lines of byte codes?
--Elizabeth
-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com] On Behalf Of
John Hansen
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 7:47 PM
To: lugnet.robotics.nxt@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: RotateMotorEx hangs
In lugnet.robotics.nxt, Elizabeth Mabrey wrote:
> "... Maybe I could check that the power level is not equal to zero as
> well..."
>
> Good idea. Will be included in the coming release?
You asked for it, you got it. :-)
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RotateMotorEx hangs
|
| (...) The change I have made is to replace this: // Waits till angle reached index __rotate_firstPort0, __rotate_ports0, NA __rotate_Running0: getout __rotate_rs0, __rotate_firstPort0, RunState brcmp EQ, __rotate_Running0, __rotate_rs0, (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
