To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.nxtOpen lugnet.robotics.nxt in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / NXT / 82
81  |  83
Subject: 
Re: NXT Motor Encoder Accuracy and Dead Reckoning
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.nxt
Date: 
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:44:00 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
11987 times
  
On Sun, August 13, 2006 12:04 am, Dick Swan wrote:
Has anyone done any experiments on the accuracy of the NXT motor "move
to" block? If so, can they post their results or impressions?

...

"Peeves consistently finished within 3 centimeters of its starting
position." Can/has the same performance been achieved with NXT using
the standard NXT-G programming language?

Yes.  Very easily.

I took my floor cleaner robot, Rosie:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hassenplug/Robots/NXT/floorcleaner.jpg

And, a two-block NXT-G program (in a loop):
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hassenplug/Robots/NXT/squareprogram.jpg

and created a robot that I think has the accuracy of "Peeves", as seen here:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hassenplug/Robots/NXT/squaremove.wmv

It appears to return within a couple cm each time.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  NXT Motor Encoder Accuracy and Dead Reckoning
 
Has anyone done any experiments on the accuracy of the NXT motor "move to" block? If so, can they post their results or impressions? I know NXT supports PID calculations to synchronize two motors and run in a straight line. Can you use this to drive (...) (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)

4 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR