Subject:
|
Re: NBC arrays
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.nxt
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 May 2007 20:46:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
19782 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Thank you for the valuable first-hand information.
It is a pitty there is no byte-code instruction to copy a part of an array
somewhere to a middle of another array (so that one does not have to index and
replace element-by-element or allocate a new copy).
Is there any information available about how many CPU cycles it takes to
interpret the individual byte-codes, please?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: NBC arrays
|
| (...) I misspoke here. It is not OP_REPLACE which requires that the output array be different from the input array. Using the same arrays as input and output with OP_REPLACE, in fact, is quite normal and usual. I was actually thinking of OP_ARRBUILD (...) (17 years ago, 5-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![NBC arrays -Pavel Petrovic (29-Apr-07 to lugnet.robotics.nxt)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: NBC arrays -John Hansen (4-May-07 to lugnet.robotics.nxt)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: NBC arrays -John Hansen (5-May-07 to lugnet.robotics.nxt)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|