 | | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible? —Johan Strandberg
|
| | | (...) I understand his confusion. Not allowing separate threads to call the same subroutine is certainly unexpected. The concept of "thread" conventionally involves separate stacks for local variables (and a shared global state -- unlike separate (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Or maybe just wrap the calls inside a mutex, so at least the behaviour is defined, if not optimum. Many of the NBC/NXC macros do exactly that, maybe all of them should? ROSCO (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible? —Matthew Jadud
|
| | | | (...) Hi Johan, While you're dealing with very practical questions here, I thought I'd throw a paper into the mix: (URL) was presented in the ACM conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) in 2005. It's a nice paper (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible? —David Wallace
|
| | | | (...) occam ... I was wondering where I had dealt with that before. Then I realized, I had a little introduction to this when writing test programs for submarine circuit cards that had used transputers. Weren't they developed by NASA? David (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible? —Matthew Jadud
|
| | | | David Wallace wrote: > occam ... I was wondering where I had dealt with that before. Then I > realized, I had a little introduction to this when writing test programs for > submarine circuit cards that had used transputers. Weren't they developed by (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| | | | |
