Subject:
|
Re: Using a 293B/293D combination
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jan 2000 06:19:44 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Will Bain <montanawill@yahoo.+AntiSpam+com>
|
Viewed:
|
731 times
|
| |
|
|
I read on this list over a year ago that you *can* piggyback the two
different chips together and still get the spike protection from the
L293D. It was explained that you don't need to piggyback two L293D
chips, because one spike-protecting chip suffices for the circuit. I
don't recall who said it, but at the time it seemed very authoritative.
-- Will
--- Daniel Segel <daniels@netcom.com> wrote:
> The HB FAQ mentions using the LM293B and LM293D chips in parallel
> (e.g.,
> one L293D and one L293B) to gain increased current-carrying
> capability. My
> question is, if I do this am I losing the function of the
> spike-protecting
> diodes on the motor outputs that the LM293D provides?
=====
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
-- Arthur C. Clark
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
