Subject:
|
Re: Two way audio -Reply
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Dec 1998 16:55:04 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Phil <{thehahns@}nospam{netwurx.net}>
|
Viewed:
|
2556 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, ? wrote:
> Yes, we have not only considered that idea, we have acted upon it. I
> guess the more operative question would have been: Is there a more
> efficient method of communication other than the wakie talkies?
CB radio's, Buisness radio (license needed), amateur radio (license
needed, again), family radio (no license), etc.
--phil
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 1998 wengd@optionshealthcare.com wrote:
>
> > How 'bout a cheap pair of voice activated walkie talkies??
> >
> > > > > "mar@cooper.edu" 12/03/98 09:38pm >>>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are trying to transmit our voices to our remote robot to create the
> > impression that the robot is talking.
> > In addition, we want to be able to hear what the robot hears.
> >
> > Does anyone know any products that we can attach to our robot that will
> > enable something like this?
> >
> > Thanks for any input. :)
> >
> > -----------
> > ericson mar Robotics Consultant
> > mar@cooper.edu
> > (212)353-4356
> >
> > Department of Mechanical Engineering The Cooper Union for the
> > Advancement of Science and Art
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Two way audio -Reply
|
| Yes, we have not only considered that idea, we have acted upon it. I guess the more operative question would have been: Is there a more efficient method of communication other than the wakie talkies? (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
