| | Re: Expansion interface status Fred G. Martin
| | | (...) Yes. The current status is "on hold" while I rethink the feature set. I'm considering doing something more like Scott Edward's little servo board for HB expansion: that is, a collection of small, physically detached boards. For servo's, I (...) (29 years ago, 22-May-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | | | Re: Expansion interface status Tom G. Brusehaver/Consultant Euler Solutions
| | | | | (...) Build a 68360 in the expander board, that'll get ethernet, and multiple SCI ports. All the IO anyone should ever need. :-). (29 years ago, 22-May-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Expansion interface status Chuck McManis
| | | | | (...) To Fred and others, I've been thinking about this off and on for over a year now, and since I now have parts I'll finally get my HBs into something more than just board status. Robots eat I/O pins for lunch. Sensors eat input pins and (...) (29 years ago, 22-May-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | |