To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.handyboardOpen lugnet.robotics.handyboard in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / Handy Board / 1586
1585  |  1587
Subject: 
Re: IR Collision avoidance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
Date: 
Sun, 2 Mar 1997 22:14:48 GMT
Original-From: 
Keith the wonder wookie <kas219@psu.[NoSpam]edu>
Viewed: 
1914 times
  

The transmitter is basically a modulator made from two 555 timer chips.
One timer does 200-1000 Hz (we use 500) while the other does 38 KHz.  On
a scope, the output looks somewhat like..

         ||||||||||          ||||||||||          ||||||||||
         |        |          |        |          |        |
         |        |          |        |          |        |
-----------         -----------         -----------        ----------

         ^                   ^                   ^        ^
         One complete cycle                      The high of each cycle
         of 500 Hz                               pulses the 38KHz

The tone decoder (receiver) demodulates the signal.  If is senses the
38KHz signal it puts out a logic one (or zero depending on design) that
can go to any available digital port.  The port is processed like...

I have a few questions for you.  How did you combine the 38khz and 500hz
signal.  In a design that I am working on now I have two signals similar to
yours and an enable signal running into a three input AND gate.  I haven't
built it yet but it simulated correctly.  In my design I am going to have
14 individual sensors being activated and sequenced with a decoder and
multiplexor.  I want to have the external circuits of the signal do as much
work as possible so that the CPU has more free time.  I need to know if I
can use a 567 tone decoder to sense the 500 Hz signal coming from the
detector.  This is important to me because I can't have the CPU constantly
looking for the signal.  Thanks for all your help.  If you have no idea
what I am asking or need more information please e-mail me.

Keith


Keith Soldavin
kas219@email.psu.edu
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/k/a/kas219/



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: IR Collision avoidance
 
Well, at risk of being branded a heretic, since you've brought up the issue of modulated IR, I'm going to throw out an observation I've made about the Radio Shack IR sensors which several other people on the mailing list have privately disagreed (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
  Re: IR Collision avoidance
 
Actually, I built the (...) This is exactly the same scheme I use. I'm using an IR module from Digi-key that has a side view, and five IR LED's spread around the front of the module at different angles. I have quite a few outputs, thanks to a little (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR