|
| | Re: Traffic
|
| (...) [snip...] (...) Ah, the pendulum begins its inexorable swing back the other way. I'm all for it. Each of these lists is focused, and I thought the original reason to break up comp.robotics was one faction not wanting to read about another (...) (28 years ago, 22-Aug-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | Re: Traffic
|
| (...) To answer Tony's question, I don't know. To answer Clint's question: I currently subscribe to tcrobots@orbis.net only. I do this mainly to get meeting info and to exchange info about availablity of parts locally. I have little or no interest (...) (28 years ago, 22-Aug-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | Re: Traffic
|
| I agree with the sentiment, don't know what to do about it. There is a pretty big PIC vs. HC11 rift as well. One would think one could separate low-level sensor and mechanical matters from higher level programming and other computer-specific stuff. (...) (28 years ago, 22-Aug-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | Re: Traffic
|
| BALSAMOT@pab22a.ssd.loral.com (BALSAMO TONY) wrote to the ROBOT-BOARD mail-list: (...) There hasn't been much traffic in the robot-board mail-list lately... at least compared to the "good old days." There are now TOO MANY robot- related mail-lists: (...) (28 years ago, 22-Aug-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | Re: compiler eror...
|
| Hi Sriram, I don't know if this is correct, but I remember reading (?hearing?) something about there being a limit to the number of consecutive if-then-else constructs. For some reason the numbers four and seven come to mind. I may be way off, but (...) (28 years ago, 21-Aug-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |