Subject:
|
RE: License agreement nuances
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:05:39 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com*StopSpam*>
|
Viewed:
|
2632 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Hodges writes:
> These license agreements are refered to as "shrinkwrap" agreements because
> you agree to them by opening the shrinkwrap. You don't have to sign
> anything.
>
> I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade, and I don't think Lego cares if
> you reverse engineer their software (as long as you don't distribute the
> results in any way), but I don't want anyone to convince themselves that
> the agreement provides a legal loophole.
Shrink-wrap licenses have no legal force. Now, can we get back to
hacking and building?
--
-russ nelson <rn-sig@crynwr.com> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: License agreement nuances
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Brian Stormont [SMTP:brian@projo.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 9:23 AM To: lego Subject: License agreement nuances (...) But, if you read further, the License Agreement also says you may "use the Software on (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
