Subject:
|
Re: Re: legOS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:54:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2375 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I am in agreement. Without just making this a "me too" I suggest that the
discussion move to Lugnet.off-topic.debate. I know that the thread is not
really a debate, but more of a discussion, but this group would serve the
purpose. I think the information and issues being discussed are important,
but would be better placed in an Lugnet.off-topic group. There the thread
can continue without complaint form me.
M2C
Thanks,
LINC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | RE: Re: legOS
|
| I agree with Russel Nelson: This thread has gone too far. It's a Lego Robotics mailing list, not a systems fundamentals course . . . verging on a semantics fest. Howard Vaan Global NT Server Engineering CREDIT | FIRST SUISSE | BOSTON Phone: +44 (0) (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![RE: Re: legOS -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Vaan, Howard) (1-Dec-98 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: legOS -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Ken Hornstein) (1-Dec-98 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![RE: Re: legOS -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Luis Villa) (1-Dec-98 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|