Subject:
|
Re: Tilt (fwd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:08:05 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Jim Choate <RAVAGE@EINSTEIN.SSZ.COMstopspammers>
|
Viewed:
|
1950 times
|
| |
|
|
----- Forwarded message from Pete Hardie -----
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 08:40:21 -0500
Subject: Re: Tilt (fwd)
From: Pete Hardie <pete.hardie@dvsg.sciatl.com>
Jim Choate wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Matt Ramadanovic -----
>
> From: "Matt Ramadanovic" <matthew.ramadanovic@yale.edu>
> Subject: Re: Tilt
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:43:55 -0500
>
> What if you made a device like a level but with a fluid that conducted
> electricity better. When the bubble is in the center it wouldn't be
> completing the circuit (off). When it on the side, it would complete a
> circuit (on). Just an Idea.
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from Matt Ramadanovic -----
>
> There's no way the bubble will keep fluid from leaking through on the bottem
> side. The gas will rise to the top and spread out under hydrostatic
> pressure.
But if the contacts are on top and bottom of the tube, the bubble will separate
them
from conductive fluid, right?
----- End of forwarded message from Pete Hardie -----
That'd work, make sure the liquid doesn't wet the container or the contacts
or you'll get a noisy switch.
____________________________________________________________________
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full
of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
