Subject:
|
Re: Tilt (fwd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:40:21 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Pete Hardie <pete.hardie@^stopspam^dvsg.sciatl.com>
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Matt Ramadanovic -----
>
> From: "Matt Ramadanovic" <matthew.ramadanovic@yale.edu>
> Subject: Re: Tilt
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:43:55 -0500
>
> What if you made a device like a level but with a fluid that conducted
> electricity better. When the bubble is in the center it wouldn't be
> completing the circuit (off). When it on the side, it would complete a
> circuit (on). Just an Idea.
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from Matt Ramadanovic -----
>
> There's no way the bubble will keep fluid from leaking through on the bottem
> side. The gas will rise to the top and spread out under hydrostatic
> pressure.
But if the contacts are on top and bottom of the tube, the bubble will separate
them
from conductive fluid, right?
--
Pete Hardie | Goalie, DVSG Dart Team
Scientific Atlanta |
Digital Video Services Group |
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Tilt (fwd)
|
| ----- Forwarded message from Matt Ramadanovic ----- From: "Matt Ramadanovic" <matthew.ramadanovic@yale.edu> Subject: Re: Tilt Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:43:55 -0500 What if you made a device like a level but with a fluid that conducted electricity (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
