 | | Re: Kego Constructopedia
|
| The Lego-Robotics WikiWeb could be constructed as a Constructopedia It would be very easy to create a Yahoo!-style category hierarchy, and the search utility just about takes care of itself. I have added a few pages to it, documenting (and linking (...) (25 years ago, 7-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Kego Constructopedia
|
| (...) ^^^...^^^ (...) ^^^...^^^ (...) ^^^...^^^ Brian, Just a couple of general comments on word usage... If at all possible, it is probably a good idea to avoid using the word "Constructopedia" in a context such as this. I don't want to see you or (...) (25 years ago, 7-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | word ownership (was Re: Kego Constructopedia)
|
| (...) I agree that we shouldn't rely on Papert's 1995 precedent on "constructopedia" to protect us against LEGO in this case, however it is also useful to be clear on this "ownership" thing. No-one owns any word. Constructopedia(r) is a registered (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
