 | | Re: Sensor Reliability —Dave Baum
| | | | Not very accurate - perhaps within 2 or 3 degrees F. The display uses 0.1 degrees precision (either C or F), but the accuracy just isn't there. I've done a little experimentation, but nothing too rigorous. No problems so far. The calibration curve (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Sensor Reliability —Ben Jackson
| | | | | In lugnet.robotics, Dave Baum writes: [regarding the accuracy of the LEGO temperature sensor] (...) My recent experience with the rotation sensor led me to two conclusions: the RAW values measured by the RCX are significantly affected by both (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Sensor Reliability —Roger Hamlett
| | | | | (...) plan (...) The reading is affected by wire length, because this introduces more capacitance in the equation. When the RCX switches off power, and takes a reading from the sensor, there is only a tiny period of time for the signal to stabilise (...) (25 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
