 | | Re: Scheme —Joel Shafer
| | | | Could you give a brief description of scheme? I've heard that it is a fairly high level language and I know that a compiler or interpreter exists for it on linux. (...) -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheme —Alex Wetmore
| | | | | From: Joel Shafer <joel@connect.net> (...) exists (...) (URL) my view Scheme is the most useful subset of lisp, designed to make a small, elegant, functional language. This is compared to Common Lisp, which is kind of a superset of the various (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheme —Eric Lind
| | | | | It strikes me that Scheme is largely an academic language. Granted, there are a few Scheme devotees out there who worship the language, but they seem to be all at MIT or Rice. I think they've even written modules for web programming with Scheme, but (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheme —Rich Clemens
| | | | | A simple scheme interface such as (sensor <num> <type> <mode>) or (motor <letter> <direction> <speed>) could prove a valuable addition to scheme teaching functions. Students could explore functions (i.e. just small "programs") to include the ability (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
