Subject:
|
Re: basic stamps
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 1999 04:41:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
935 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Darxus) writes:
> I've heard about a lot of neat ways people have been circumventing the
> limitations of mindstorms. I've been wondering why I haven't heard
> anything about people replacing the RCX unit with a basic stamp.
[snip]
Oh its not forgotten! I am waiting for some spare cycles to see if I can
send serial data out from either the IR on the RCX or a motor output on the
RCX to one of my Stamp II Miniboards. I just haven't had the time!
DLC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | basic stamps
|
| I've heard about a lot of neat ways people have been circumventing the limitations of mindstorms. I've been wondering why I haven't heard anything about people replacing the RCX unit with a basic stamp. (URL) Stamps are small, self-contained (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread: ![basic stamps -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Darxus) (5-May-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|