Subject:
|
RE: legOS development release imminent / C++
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Feb 1999 17:24:24 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Paul Curtis <plc@rowley.co.ukSTOPSPAMMERS>
|
Viewed:
|
1732 times
|
| |
|
|
Ben,
> Markus L. Noga wrote:
> > I'm worried about compactness with C++ in general. The code • generated by
> > this function is 76 bytes long:
> >
> > void do_sensing_c() {
> > int i;
> > ds_active(&SENSOR_1);
> >
> > for(i=0; i<100; i++) {
> > cputw(SENSOR_1);
> > lcd_refresh();
> > delay(20);
> > }
> > ds_passive(&SENSOR_1);
> > }
> >
> > The exact same thing in C++ generates 232 bytes:
> >
> > void do_sensing_cpp() {
> > Sensor s(Sensor::s1,1);
> >
> > for(int i=0; i<100; i++) {
> > cputw(s.value());
> > lcd_refresh();
> > delay(20);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > A factor of three. I'm not sure whether it's worth treading this
> path.
>
> These don't look exactly the same to me, but without the definition of
> Sensor, its hard to say...
I think you'll find the destructor for Sensor effectively
encapsulates ds_passive().
-- Paul.
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
