Subject:
|
Re: Alternative compilers for native RCX code?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 18:58:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1124 times
|
| |
|
|
Do you have a URL of where to download the GCC/EGCS compiler? Yes, I'm lazy and
don't wish to hunt it down. :) I tried searcing this NG for 'compiler' but did
not find a ref. for this one in the messages located.
thanks,
-Wes
dave madden wrote:
<SNIP>
> If "low cost" is your discriminator, you can't get much less expensive
> than GCC/EGCS. The cygwin directory on an NT box I have is only about
> 32MB (add 22MB for emacs), whereas the M$VC++ directory tree on the
> same box consumes 700MB; so "small" is another word I'd apply to
> cygwin. (Of course, that copy of cygwin contains the native x86
> compiler, but I can't imagine the H8 compiler would be *that* much
> larger.)
>
> Now, I'm aware that GCC/EGCS has shortcomings, particularly as
> compared to the (expensive) native compilers on many platforms, but as
> a hobbyist on a limited budget myself, I consider the GNU compiler
> (and related development programs) to be the finest tools in my kit.
>
> BTW, I'm using egcs-1.1.1 on Linux to develop a c++ firmware
> replacement. When I get a little more functionality into it, I'll
> post details.
>
> regards,
> d.
> --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Alternative compilers for native RCX code?
|
| =>From: "Gavin Smyth" <gavin@beeskneesDOTf...OTcoDOTuk> =>... =>A brief web search for "H8" and "compiler" showed up a number of people =>selling, er, H8/300 compilers. One notable entry was HI-TECH Software who =>have a limited eval compiler (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
