| | Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
I think you chose your word poorly. Ignorance is not the problem..._fear_ is the problem. Why do you think so many _computer_programmers_ are heading for the proverbial hills? They are scared, and, as a technogeek since I was 10, I too am scared. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | RE: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
(...) indeed. (...) Please, no mor Y2K. If the Y2K bug is really as huge as some of you people anticipate your least concern will be if your lego-toys will work. Simen -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
I amnot worred about Jan 1, 2000, as I am about May 5, 2000. The day that 7 of the 9 planets all are aligned together. John A. Donaldson (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
(...) I've heard that the gravitational influence will make all the studs pop off Lego. Is it true? Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
In article <36B4D51C.33C63798@a...up.co.uk>, Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> writes (...) No. It's on 9/9/99 that all the studs pop off. (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
(...) 1) no they won't be and 2) even if they were, they don't make any difference on Earth. (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Fw: VERY Off topic [was Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???)
|
|
Peter Hesketh wrote in message ... (...) but *Which* 99? 9/9/99 was a *long* time ago. 9/9/1999 could be a problem for most of us. 9/9/2099 probably won't be.[1] -- Steven | svore at mindspring .com | kf4fbk | TC++MS++#15LS+M+HalYB64m 1 - if you're (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|