 | | Re: Finally, I found the answer!!
|
|
(...) I am missing the packet length in the command packet. before send a command packet, the length of the packet must be sent first. Size of the packet length is word(2 byte), but value of the packet length is not included itself. (16 years ago, 16-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | I am stuck while programming for comunication to lego NXT
|
|
I am a hobbyist programmer and trying to make NXT remote control program for PC. anyway, I am succeed open bluetooth SPP, send a command, and got response from the NXT. But the problem is.... sending tons of repeatly command and one response. NXT (...) (16 years ago, 15-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | My first year with my own FLL team
|
|
After helping my son’s school with their FLL team last year I got the wild idea to start my own FLL team this past year. I had no idea what I was in for but I knew that I wanted to put together a team that was dedicated to learning about FLL and (...) (16 years ago, 11-Feb-09, to lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Galvanic Skin Response Sensor
|
|
Over the nearly 10 years that I've had a MINDSTORMS related website I've noticed that my most popular homebrew sensor is the one for Galvanic Skin Response. This type sensor is used in lie detectors and biofeedback devices. I recently updated the (...) (16 years ago, 11-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Control Lab Interface response time
|
|
(...) I have a Delphi program for communicating with the old Dacta interface 70909 here: (URL) that can be used for Control Lab too? (16 years ago, 7-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Control Lab Interface response time
|
|
(...) Yes, the response time of the CLI is rather disappointing to say the least. Personally I think the CLI is best suited for controlling things like lights, and motors on someones town layout. For anything that requires precise control use an RCX (...) (16 years ago, 7-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Control Lab Interface response time
|
|
(...) Yes, the response time of the CLI is rather disappointing to say the least. Personally I think the CLI is best suited for controlling things like lights, and motors on someones town layout. For anything that requires precise control use an RCX (...) (16 years ago, 7-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using generic IR ports for RCX 1.5
|
|
(...) IrDA works quite differently from what the RCX is capable of understanding normally under usual firmware. I don't think that you can change the dongle reactions, since on the physical layer it will work according to the IrDA specifications. (...) (16 years ago, 7-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Control Lab Interface response time
|
|
(...) Whoah, a full second?! That's pretty useless! :( I'm trying to find software to program the ControlLab right now, but if this is the case, I might as well abandon any plans I had on using it. Fine motor control would be completly impossible. (...) (16 years ago, 5-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using generic IR ports for RCX 1.5
|
|
I've seen many people attempt this, but none who have succeeded. (but I won't say it's not possible) Steve (...) (16 years ago, 5-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics)
|
