Subject:
|
RE: simple but functional radar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 02:53:32 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Tim McSweeney <TIM@antispamAMS.CO.NZ>
|
Viewed:
|
950 times
|
| |
|
|
I don't know :) that's part of the fun!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Eilebrecht [mailto:ericeil@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 3:43 PM
> To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
> Subject: RE: simple but functional radar
>
>
> Ah - sorry about the misunderstanding. That would work, of
> course. But is
> it possible to send and receive IR signals simultaneously?
>
> Eric
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim McSweeney [mailto:tim@ams.co.nz]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 6:38 PM
> To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
> Subject: RE: simple but functional radar
>
>
> I think you misunderstood a bit. You still use the Light Sensor as
> discussed to get an approximate range, It'll never be great,
> All you use the
> RCX's IR input for is to verify that the signal you recieved
> was the one you
> sent out.
>
> The two work together to solve the problem.
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: simple but functional radar
|
| Ah - sorry about the misunderstanding. That would work, of course. But is it possible to send and receive IR signals simultaneously? Eric -----Original Message----- From: Tim McSweeney [mailto:tim@ams.co.nz] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 6:38 PM (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
