Subject:
|
Re: monkey rail
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:31:27 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
linmix <linmix@{antispam}gmail.com>
|
Viewed:
|
3339 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by 'use locomotion' nor am I
suer how a race would work, but your ideas are appreciated. I hadn't
thought about not using electricity at all.
The only train stuff I have is a couple of blue rails... another dead
end, but maybe someone else can do something with the idea.
regards
linmix
Lauren Daniel wrote:
> Hello, thanks again. One thing I was thinking about building is a
> stationary base that has a pivot on one side and notches on the
> other. It could sit flat or be raised on one side by hand.
> Then instead of haveing a motor control the rail use a mechanical link
> that runs the distance underneath and comes out under the base pivot.
> Then a person controlling it would sit at the pivot end and operate a
> horizontel slider. You would have precision control of marble. Even
> better would be to position a second one right next to it shareing
> some infrastructure but haveing it's own actuator. Then 2 people could
> race each other.
> or
> if you want it powered without rotation sensors use locomotion to
> actuate instead of a rack. that way if you use the Pole Reversers it
> will keep going instead of running out of travel.
> The train regulator would be better then the Technic Pole Reversers
> for this because you would have speed control.
> Cheers Chris
> */linmix <linmix@gmail.com>/* wrote:
>
> maybe I can even do something without an RCX, by using a couple
> of Electric Technic Pole Reversers (Peeron #6551) I have from a
> Space Shuttle set for the controls.
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
