 | | RE: TLG & MIT Media Labs spawn another product: PicoCricket —Dick Swan
| | | | On Thursday, August 31, 2006 7:03 AM danny staple wrote: "Question - does anyone know how many output or input modules could be attached, and if there are any plans for seperate motor control boards? I strongly agree with Brian that having the motor (...) (18 years ago, 31-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: TLG & MIT Media Labs spawn another product: PicoCricket —Brian Davis
| | | | | | In lugnet.robotics, Dick Swan wrote: [a whole lot of useful stuff] Thank you! Clearly you'e played with these at some time in the past then. So another qustion... can the picocricket be reprogrammed with custom FW, or made to work with NQC (...) (18 years ago, 31-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: TLG & MIT Media Labs spawn another product: PicoCricket —Danny Staple
| | | | | (...) So bar power requirements, what is the addressing range of that? It would be cool to be able to daisy chain elements, and jsut add additional power where needed. (...) Each device having its own micro explains the expense, I take it that only (...) (18 years ago, 31-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
