 | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Suzanne Rich
|
| | | (...) What's the current consensus on this? Personally, I'm feeling like we should add a group, and do it now, as people are beginning to receive their sets. But I don't use this area frequently. Would we have a volunteer for curator of this new (...) (18 years ago, 3-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | RE: NXT newsgroup needed —Liz Bilbro
|
| | | | | I like the idea of the newsgroups staying together -- I mean having one newsgroup for RCX and NXT stuff. I read all the information. I like seeing what people think of the NXT and how they are using it. I'd rather not monitor two lists. I intend on (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Danny Staple
|
| | | | | | I can see most groups in one place, as I use most of them like a mailing list (although this means I miss out on the joy of FTX). I tend to agree that I would like to see both NXT and RCX stuff as well as a lot of the other robotics and lego stuff, (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —robert hampton
|
| | | | | | My thought is to have a single Mindstorm group because I think almost everyone is interested in both. I only have a single RCX and am not planning on upgrading anytime soon (got into RCX relatively late in the game). In fact I am hoping to find a (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Danny Staple
|
| | | | | | Hi Robert, That would work for us on a mailing list, but not those who want to differentiate by drilling down on the web interface. If you are on a mailing list, it really is pretty painless to subscribe to more than one list. I think having two (...) (18 years ago, 4-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Suzanne Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) At the moment, I'd suggest looking at these, if you haven't already: (URL) (18 years ago, 5-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Jordan Bradford
|
| | | | | (...) I started this thread, so obviously my vote is for creating a separate NXT group. In other posts some people indicated they'd like all discussions grouped together so they're easier to see in news reading software. It's been my habit to post (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed — Gereon Stein
|
| | | | | (...) Suz, I wouldn't worry too much about this - once NXT becomes widely available, a separate group will more than have its justification. You'll always find newcomer questions in such groups, as happens on all forums or lists, and the (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Suzanne Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) [...] (...) Ah, yes. I see. And yesterday a friend told me much the same thing. So, I understand both the logic and wisdom of what you are saying, and I agree. (...) true. I believe there are a fair number of such people. (...) good point. (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) I vote yes please. ROSCO (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —Roger Glassey
|
| | | | | | (...) Another YES from me. Roger Glassey (18 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed —David Schilling
|
| | | | I still think it would be a good idea to have a separate NXT group. -- David Schilling (18 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
