 | | Re: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones) —PeterBalch
|
| | | Bruce (...) Ermm. How much does a NXT have? No doubt you think that everyone should buy one of your systems but far more NXTs will be sold. Lookng at the posts on other robotics newsgroups, I reckon that over 90% of home-made robots do not have (...) (18 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones) —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | | (...) Why do you say that? I thought we were discussing Java on robotics. You said Java for small robots was not practical. I presented our system as but one implementation which works. (...) That's the total *available* memory. The JVM is in (...) (18 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why Java for Robots (university vs hobbyists) —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | (...) Maybe we are at cross purposes here. You may be right, that for many hobbyists, Java is too advanced and complex, and since their needs are simpler, C is more than enough. Ease of use and low cost is probably more important than computing (...) (18 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
