 | | Re: pwering the NXT —Brian Davis
|
| | | (...) I think several hundred of us would just *love* to do that. One small problem... how did you get to? Pleeeease... (...) Well, that would be very handy. Restoring one of the number one requested items dropped from the 1.0 brick would be a good (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: pwering the NXT —Christian Treczoks
|
| | | | (...) I always wanted to say that: "I could tell you, but then I would have to kill you" ;-) Yours, Christian (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: pwering the NXT —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) Brian, If it makes you feel any better, the information has been tracked back to it's source, and it's a long way from where you live. Steve (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | NXT question: port allocation —dan miller
|
| | | | Question for the in-the-know crowd -- does the NXT have 3 motor ports and 4 sensor ports, or 7 general-purpose ports? IOW, could you connect 4 motors and only 3 sensors? (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | | (...) I'm sure I've read there are 3 motor ports, and 4 sensor ports. But, things may not be that black and white. Remember, each motor has a rotation sensor built in. However, the pictures do show motors connected to port A, B & C, and sensors (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —Andrew Cross
|
| | | | | | (...) Amuzingly, "4" is missing from Lego's model images (which are rendered) but is there for the live teenager shots. Could it be a "special" plug for the ultrasonic sensor? I hope not. (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —Chris Magno
|
| | | | Is it my poor memory, OR did the first communication from lego say that it was 3 in and 3 out, PLUS the Ultrasonic sensor. In the rendered pics of the NXT, it has output pots 1 -3 labeled, but the 4th is not. always questions, and silence from Ralph (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | | (...) I'm pretty sure you won't find any place that says 3in+3out. The rendered pictures do show 1 unmarked port. What about this (actual photo?): (URL) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —David Schilling
|
| | | | (...) Maybe they're too busy playing with some new robotics system or another? :-) -- David Schilling (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NXT question: port allocation —Chris Magno
|
| | | | (...) So, Dave. Glad to hear from you. What have you built? You too Ralph. I know you read this. :) Chris (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
