Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT and memory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:35:30 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ignacio Martinez Vazquez <ignamv@gmail.AVOIDSPAMcom>
|
Viewed:
|
8934 times
|
| |
|
|
> If you are mapping a 30' x 30' room - and (say) you need a byte for
> every square inch of the floor so you can map the position of chair
> legs and such
You could use a bit per square inch
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT and memory
|
| (...) You could - but I might want to store more than one bit of information per square inch (eg a 'confidence' figure or a 'time since last mapped' number - or to store multiple maps so I can see how the map is changing over time). The point is (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: mindstorms NXT and memory
|
| (...) It depends where your ambitions lie. If you want to analyse audio or video or map your environment somehow - then 64Kb is pathetically small. If all you want is something that's just a small step ahead of an RCX then it's plenty. Of course you (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
