Subject:
|
Re: pwering the NXT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:36:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7384 times
|
| |
|
|
Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Gyl Midroni wrote:
>
> > Why was the option for an Adaptor not included with the NXT?
>
>
> I suspect cost - remember, it was taken out of the RCX after 1.0.
We dont know if it was taken out due to cost, OR due to the number of
problems it had caused there customer service dept.
I recall several posts from people claiming to have fried there units
because they had plugged some non-acceptable power source into the rcx.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: pwering the NXT
|
| (...) There is soemthing about that seems very, very likely. What they could do is a moulded, polarised connector, something that is their own, but not too hard for a real tinkerer to copy if they wanted to, and make sure the spec is well known. (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: pwering the NXT
|
| (...) Yes, that would make sense to me. The only thing I can think of that recommends against it is use by kids. With both assemblies in one case, the kid can't loose the batteries. Consumers are used to their toys (and, for that matter, their (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
