Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 21:48:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7365 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
>
> How would you create a rover-based robot with just three motors? I want to
> design more complex rovers other than the two-wheeled plus caster designs.
> Something like the shrimp for instance. The old rcx allows you to connect
> multiple motors to the same port. Also, the motor port could be used for other
> sensors and powering other things as well...
So you parallel motors on the same port to do different things? As opposed to
using a single motor mechanically coupled to different things? Is this as a
result of a single motor not being powerful enough? Or because the two
paralleled motors are moving with respect to each other so mechanical
distribution from a single more powerful motor wouldn't do it?
JB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) Or they are far enough apart or in a difficult arrangement so that a mechanical link is impractical. (eg: moving WRT each other.) ROSCO (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) How would you create a rover-based robot with just three motors? I want to design more complex rovers other than the two-wheeled plus caster designs. Something like the shrimp for instance. The old rcx allows you to connect multiple motors to (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
