Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 21:02:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7415 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, John Barnes wrote:
>
> > The NDA is still firmly in place. And they know where we live ;)
> >
> > But, I am very interested by your multiple motor question however. Why do you
> > need to connect multiple motors?
> >
> > JB
>
> How would you create a rover-based robot with just three motors? I want to
> design more complex rovers other than the two-wheeled plus caster designs.
> Something like the shrimp for instance. The old rcx allows you to connect
> multiple motors to the same port. Also, the motor port could be used for other
> sensors and powering other things as well...
Hope its possible to create an I2C port using the sensor ports. Its a shame
they didnt create an I2C port for daisychaining sensors. Or is the sonar port a
I2C port....
Ram
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) My conclusion that the bus is multipurpose stems from the evidence that there is a speed sensor (optoencoder of some sort?) on the motors. I presume that means that the motor ports have both output (motor control) and input (sensor feedback). (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) How would you create a rover-based robot with just three motors? I want to design more complex rovers other than the two-wheeled plus caster designs. Something like the shrimp for instance. The old rcx allows you to connect multiple motors to (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
